"the planet is fine; the people are fucked"

A commenter here posted this link and I found it rather interesting…
As in, a useful perspective to keep in mind, every now and again. I liked it not so much for any sentiments against environmentalism, as I did for sentiments against our sense of importance:

Complex accounting is routing strategy. It's here to stay.

multinet[updated : 2009-12-19]

The only thing that’s interesting about the copenhagen climate summit is the strategies that nations employ to wriggle out of real and tangible cuts in emissions.

The interconnectedness of environmental and other systems on our planet has made us turn, naturally, to network theory for gaining useful insights. This is becoming more so with regard to how we manage the environment.

The first weapon drawn from the network theory arsenal is almost always economic theory… which – I feel – is just a narrower, more specialised type of network theory. Economics seems to be a set of stripped down routing games that focus on monetarily-quantifiable payoffs.

Continue reading

rising apette spotted at a small angle theta from…

Comfy?! SEX SHOULDN’T BE COMFY!!
- chiwetel Ejiofor as Lola, in the movie ‘Kinky Boots’.

[I warn you that, even for the tinuum, this is going to be a spectacularly nonsensical (to you), rambling post. And downright incoherent.].

***

earth-motherSince you are still here I will ask you this: have you sworn an oath of allegiance to Mother Nature, and would you want to, if you thought you had a choice? Do you presume that you already have? If so, why? She hasn’t, after all, done a whole lot for you in particular.  This isn’t a sacrilegious statement – she works for the species; not you, not me.

It’s interesting that while all manner of Gods have been taking a bollocking of late, unimpressed as we’ve become with religion, somehow the Mother Nature meme has remained relatively unscathed. Having crept caterpillar out of the “earth mother” archetypal memeplex and inched its way across the fecund landscape of our collective imaginations, don’t you think it’s high time Mother Nature got on with her metamorphosis?

I mean, when will the idea of her flutter off and leave us alone? Or at least be transmogrified into the next generation of slightly-more-useful ideas?

Continue reading

Biosynthetic programming tools and technologies

art-of-dnaWow – what an amazing roundup… if you haven’t checked out Melanie Swan’s recent posts on bioinformatics, do so now.

Most of the concepts are way over my head but it is interesting to see how yet another “information technology” discipline bootstraps itself into being.

What would be great to see:
1) traditional software development methodologies continuing to learn from /benefit from their bioinformatics counterparts (we’ve already benefited from ideas like genetic algorithms and evolutionary methods), and

2) bio-informatics focussing on what (I’m guessing) it will be better at: modelling/simulation of non-linear dynamical systems, equilibrium systems, networks and so on. By which I mean there’s no point reinventing every wheel that’s been invented in the software engineering realm up till now.  It would be the typical software engineering problem of “staring at the current system” so long that when we get round to modeling the required (new) system, we can’t shake the shackles of how things used to be done, and we can’t really think outside the box.

I hope open genomics and bioinformatics branch out to do their own thing. A new approach to algorithms, a new way of decomposing systems, attendent new methodologies and microarchitectures for carving up the problem (and solution) domains. Interesting times ahead, however you slice it…

***

image cred: tweaked img uploaded by svilen

Re-grown tracheas, livers and hearts? Get outta here!

OK. I’ve waffled about genomics in the past, but do please go ‘n get this stuff straight from the horse’s mouth (as it were): Hop over here and then skip the vid ahead or click on the ‘programming cells‘ link.

Have a listen. Is that not insane?! And yet awesome at the same time? Also keep watching… he has some interesting things to say about the impact of genomics on the economy, not to mention giving a big hint-hint, nudge-nudge to developing countries about getting in on the action before, as usual, it’s too darned late.

(btw when you’re done, you can watch the whole series of presentations from the beginning).

*** photo : Juan Enriquez – Bioscience Entrepreneur.

My Cool Cosmos Day of Astronomy

My ‘Cool Cosmos’ day at the Ontario Science Center started with Ivan Semeniuk‘s talk, titled ‘The Future of Cosmic Exploration‘. He explained how the 2009 is the ‘International Year of Astronomy‘ because 400 years ago, in 1609, Galileo perfected the telescope as a device for studying the heavens, subsequently discovering Jupiters moons and their orbits.

From Semeniuk’s compactified history, I learned that astronomy predates this 400-year mark, with large observatories having existed for centuries before that. These earlier observatories did not use telescopes or other optical aids, but managed to record and tabulate phenomena to piece together the eliptical dances of celestial bodies.

So the telescope is what really opened up the field: suddenly any Tom, Dick and Harry with 2 bits of glass and an interest in the heavens (or, more to the point, an interest in making a name for themselves) could jump onto the bandwagon and start discovering new stars. This is what lead to the rapid growth of astronomy and, with the increasing variety of instruments that we can point at the sky, the birth of its sister-discipline: astrophysics. The latter, I learned, had more to do with understanding (for example) the constituency of matter, with tools such as spectroscopy making it possible to deduce the mixtures of gases or the ratios of certain chemical elements of matter in space. Some more info about future astronomy after the jump… Continue reading

more genomics…

Check out this post about the future of biology at broad perspectives (formerly futurememes) on more interesting developments in the world of genomics. To quote briefly from the post,

“The two biggest current revolutions are in personalized genomics and synthetic biology”…

Yep. That’s as expected. And that’s why we need more open-ness.

And also more education. I wonder if the curriculum for biology is being expanded to include the dazzling array of technologies and attendant moral and legal issues. If in a few generations’ time people are going to have to be able to make informed choices about what to do with bits of their own DNA, their own personal biology, I hope they’ll know enough to make the right decision.