memes: mimicry vs replication

[updated 2009-03-03]

The core thrust of making memetics a respectable science with falsifiable claims and other tell-tale signs of ‘rigour’ has been the idea of replication.

As I wrote in a much older post about memes, there have already been some interesting replicators posited as possible memes. Unfortunately, this path hasn’t yielded the big breakthroughs that would firmly establish memetics as a discipline. Too bad, cos it would have meant that real-life, genetic replication of the deoxyribonucleic kind, with its attendant body of knowledge and tried-and-tested paradigms, would have been the perfect model for the fledgling science of memetics.

Bruce Edmond‘s article here neatly sums up the problems of the replicator-based model, and why memeticists have… well, disappeared into the ether. Continue reading

Frak this! Galactica's linguistic legacy.

So apparently, the word ‘Frak’ is fast becoming everyone’s favourite swearword. The ingenuity of the word Frak lies in its phonetic similarity to its grosser cousin. It wouldn’t work half as well as the other word if it didn’t sound so completely like it. And yet it isn’t that other word… a fact that has allowed it to slip deftly through the usual censorship nets. Continue reading

Savannah thinking vs post-scarcity thinking

(updated 2009-10-11)
I have a silly pet name for that part of our survival instinct that has been annealed through eons of ‘belong-or-perish’ regimes. I call it ‘Savannah Thinking’.

Figuring out what the group consensus is, and and then acting accordingly has worked since we, as is now generally accepted, got down from the trees and struck out onto the plains. Being ostracized by the group probably greatly reduced one’s chances of survival, and nobody wanted to be the chimp on the bottom rung of the social ladder (punching bag with no grooming or mating rights? no thanks!). Continue reading